Thank you. But that's the first Video in the series. I already have that. Different top and different girl to start with.He takes the strap out first nearly 5 minutes into the vid 🙂
You must be registered to view links and images
Thanks. But If you look at my thumb above this video should start with the top retrieving the cane from the cupboard and the girl downing her knickers "prior to" the caning. Instead it cuts in at a later part of her punishment.without the start but hot !
Yes, have seen these and no Reform School Discipline 2_part_1 cuts in after the delectable creature is chastised and then made to lower her knickers and bend over the desk for the cane. Being a purist, particularly for these old gems, I need that part included, My new upscale is looking amazingly good, so i would kindly ask anyone of you who might have that section (which I know exists, be cause I had it of old before my PC crash) to take a look.
It's tone too though, not just the obvious (girls are genuinely cute and not covered in tattoos, not a ton of other fetishes like diapers and such crammed in). It's very "old school British" in the sense of "acts smug and posh but actually a huge wicked pervert" which I find amusing, and it has a playful mean streak (for wont of a better term) that pushes my buttons; the girls are usually of the more sweet, innocent and undeserving ilk (than the later more common brats, "tarts" and troublemakers you'll find elsewhere), and the scenarios are more often than not pretty unfair and mean... but not in a BDSM torturous/vicious way. Kind of the "oh, sorry sweet girl, I know it's unfair but I just had to trick you into a situation where I get to smack your bum" and the unfortunate girl has to accept that authority, like it or not. Does that make sense or am I rambling? 😆Yep ... I sum it up as "Raw, no fluff ... and true to the subject in hand!" They are just not made like that any more. It was of course from a yesteryear when real fantasy video (and magazine) creators were able to work unfettered without the shackles of today's world order.
You clearly get it BB. Some people don't like the old stuff. I absolutely love it! Sweet undeserving often cute girls, natural unrehearsed naivety, puppy dog eyes fighting real tears. The often sparse sets, creaky old wooden chairs and desks right out of the 60's,It's tone too though, not just the obvious (girls are genuinely cute and not covered in tattoos, not a ton of other fetishes like diapers and such crammed in). It's very "old school British" in the sense of "acts smug and posh but actually a huge wicked pervert" which I find amusing, and it has a playful mean streak (for wont of a better term) that pushes my buttons; the girls are usually of the more sweet, innocent and undeserving ilk (than the later more common brats, "tarts" and troublemakers you'll find elsewhere), and the scenarios are more often than not pretty unfair and mean... but not in a BDSM torturous/vicious way. Kind of the "oh, sorry sweet girl, I know it's unfair but I just had to trick you into a situation where I get to smack your bum" and the unfortunate girl just has to accept that authority, like it or not. Does that make sense or am I rambling? 😆
You're awesome for restoring and preserving any such material; I'd love to see anything you do in that realm.You clearly get it BB. Some people don't like the old stuff. I absolutely love it! Sweet undeserving often cute girls, natural unrehearsed naivety, puppy dog eyes fighting real tears. The often sparse sets, creaky old wooden chairs and desks right out of the 60's,
That is my thing, and why i am passionate about restoration of some of these old Gems.
You're awesome for restoring and preserving any such material; I'd love to see anything you do in that realm.
As for the tone difference, I feel the same about magazines too, perhaps even more so. The writing style is so different from what you find mostly today, with a few exceptions. My own writing attempts (though I've never shared them, just written for fun) have always tried to echo that vibe.
I sometimes feel a tiny bit bad that my favorite spankees are always sweet undeserving girls, but it is true: those puppy dog eyes, those innocent nervous expressions, those weepy heartfelt tears... I like the scenario where an anxious never-spanked-before girl brims with watery eyes softly asks "please not too hard, sir?" and nonetheless receives the full force of a strong palm, and maybe the brush or paddle or cane too. Not because she was especially naughty, you understand, but because a bottom like hers just begs for the paddle or cane (even though her mouth begs for anything but).
I console myself that as someone who also likes F/M, those are the kind of male spankees I prefer to read about too, and why most F/M videos with loudmouth or stoic or elderly (!) male spankees fail for me.
Edit: I forgot to add that Roue (and to be fair, a couple of others from that era or in the same spirit) do costuming well. I hate how modern videos so often have lazy costumes, both spankers and spankees. Or they dress "innocent" spankees in scandalous underwear (or none!) while the "professor" spanker wears some ugly-ass t-shirt from his own closet. White cotton panties and pleated skirts for school scenes, demure or naively-short summer dresses/shorts for home scenes, white vests and panties for "punishment uniform" scenes (something Clare Fonda thankfully seemingly has a fetish for so rarely screws up regardless of anything else!). My palm itches just looking at girls in those costumes! 😏
And yes, sets too. Nothing takes me out of a video faster than a "school" scene shot in a living room, or a "home" scene shot in a motel room, or worst of all with camera and lighting gear in shot!